Skip to content
Lawyers Blog

Lawyers Blog

Menu
  • Home
  • About Me
  • Blog
    • Chemical Exposure Law
    • Defective Products Law
    • Dog Bites
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Work Related Injury
  • Auto Accident Law
    • Bus Accident Law
    • Car Accident
    • Truck Accident
  • Wrongful Death Claims
    • Amusement Park Injuries
    • Construction Injuries
  • Reach Me
    • Privacy Policy

Permanent work-related injury disqualifies employee from ADA coverage

April 3, 2018

A stationary engineer for the Department of Transportation injured his right knee, left elbow and both shoulders at work. He job duties included being responsible for maintaining all the equipment at the DOT headquarters, and his essential functions required manual labor, walking, squatting, lifting and climbing. The engineer’s work restrictions required him to be permanently restricted in performing these manual activities. The DOT allowed him to work light duty temporarily but eventually required him to perform all maintenance duties. When he was injured again, the DOT required him to go on nonoccupational leave of absence, and he never returned to work.

The engineer sued under ADA Title I for failure to accommodate his disability. The District Court granted summary judgment to the DOT. The court held that the engineer was not a qualified individual with a disability because he could not fulfill his job’s essential functions. The engineer argued that he could perform his essential functions with accommodation. However, the court pointed out that asking the DOT to eliminate essential duties (all work involving physical exertion) or to assign other employees to perform the duties the engineer couldn’t perform as accommodations was not reasonable under the ADA. Even if the DOT had allowed the engineer to temporarily avoid the duties outside his medical restrictions, it was not obligated to continue to do so indefinitely, according to the court.

Football Receiver wins $11.5 Million in Medical Malpractice Lawsuit

March 12, 2018

 

This wide receiver never won a Super Bowl in his playing days but it appears he’s just won a big one off the field.

He has been awarded $11.5 million in a lawsuit against his former doctor over his career-ending  injury, according to the Associated Press. The doctor  used to work as a team doctor. He called the damage award a travesty and will most likely appeal the decision.

The attorney for the receiver told the news source that the award is fair compensation for his client’s lost earnings.

The lawsuit stems from the injury the receiver suffered, which eventually forced him to retire after eight effective seasons in the NFL. Several other doctors have settled with the wideout rather than go to court.

The football player spent most of his playing career catching passes. He was reasonably successful in this role, hauling in many touchdown passes in his career.

Republicans Continue to Push for Tort Reform

“The effort to overhaul the nation’s health care system has so far skirted the issue of tort reform, intensifying debate over the role malpractice lawsuits play in increasing premiums.” Critics say the new health reform law does not do enough to address the high costs of medical lawsuits, but other experts say that malpractice suits do not contribute to increasing health costs. “That hasn’t changed the sentiment of local Republican members of Congress, who argue the savings from reducing medical lawsuits would be significant. … ‘In fact, the Congressional Budget Office told Congress that the federal government could save up to $54 billion over 10 years by implementing medical malpractice reform. If it had built on this example, the health care law could have had an impact on costs nationwide.’”

According to other experts, a more efficient way to cut costs would be to look toward quality control. “Credible reports estimate that 100,000 Americans die each year from medical errors. The public would not tolerate hundreds of commercial plane crashes a year claiming that number of lives each year, he said”.

Jury Awards Woman $3.5 Million Malpractice Verdict

February 16, 2018

A 53-year-old woman on Thursday won a $3.5 million medical malpractice verdict against two surgeons and their business.

After nine hours of deliberation, a civil jury found the doctors responsible for the woman’s painful condition, her attorneys said.

Her lawyers said their client underwent surgery for blocked arteries. But they claim that the doctors used an improper grafting technique, leading to blood loss and various injuries, including damage to her spinal cord, which left the woman paraplegic and unable to walk, though she still has some feeling in her legs. She’s in constant pain.

The woman walked in to the hospital in “4-inch heels and she was never able to walk out,” adding that the verdict has given her a sense of security. The jury awarded Little $1.3 million in non-economic damages, $2 million for future medical bills, and more than $200,000 for her prior bills.

An attorney for the doctors said the complication that occurred in the woman’s aorta surgery is known to happen “in the best of hands” and that the technique was appropriate.

“This is a nice lady who had a poor outcome, but it was not malpractice by these two well-trained surgeons,” the doctor’s attorney said. “We are reviewing the case for appeal.” He also expects the amount awarded to be reduced as a matter of law.

Posts pagination

Previous 1 … 8 9 10 … 12 Next

Find Here!

Archives

  • August 2025
  • April 2025
  • January 2025
  • July 2024
  • January 2024
  • July 2022
  • October 2021
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • August 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • August 2009
  • August 2008

Categories

  • Amusement Park Injuries
  • Auto Accident Law
  • Blog
  • Bus Accident Law
  • Car Accident
  • Chemical Exposure Law
  • Construction Injuries
  • Defective Products Law
  • Dog Bites
  • Medical Malpractice
  • personal injury law
  • Truck Accident
  • truck accident lawyers
  • Work Related Injury
  • Wrongful Death Claims
TOP ARTICLES
  • Interstate 10 Truck Accident Lawyer West Texas
  • What to Do Immediately After a Car Accident in Texas
  • What Does a Personal Injury Lawyer Do?
  • How Personal Injury Lawyers in Corpus Christi Handle Car Accident Claims
  • Truck Accidents Are Devastating
TAGS
12-Year-Old Boy Dies Car Accident CA Republicans Christina Aguilera Fatal Car Accident Faulty Roller Coaster Lawsuit Evidence Malpractice Malpractice Verdict medical malpractice insurers Medical Malpractice Lawsuit Truck accident work-related injury Wrongful Death Arguements Wrongful Death Suit Wrongful Foreclosure Scandal
QUICK LINKS
  • About Me
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Reach Me
PENDAS ATTORNEYS

© 2025 Lawyers Blog. All Rights Reserved